//
archives

CRJ

This tag is associated with 5 posts

SUMMARY: Bombardier’s stock (TSE:BBD.B) hit a new 22 year low again today at $C 1.46 a share, a 62% drop from a year ago, market capitalization is now $C 3.25 billion (less than CAE and just above WestJet Airlines) for a $US 20 billion a year company, that is just unacceptable for any public company. The company just announced a 2 year delay in its new $US 75 million per unit Global 7000 business jet program (already behind by 2 years), right after it announced a 30% production reduction from 80 to 55 units per year of its “cash cow” Global 5000/6000 business jet brand due to a ‘softening’ market globally but also very much due to competition from the #1 OEM in the ultra-long range segment (+/- 48% market share), Gulfstream Aerospace, which is having a very strong sales year (book to bill ratio is 1.0+) with its new G500/600’s and existing G650/G650ER’s , and # 3 OEM (+/- 15% market share), Dassault, with its new Falcon 8X and 5X. Bombardier’s CEO Alain Bellemare is doing a great job keeping the “Titanic” afloat, but 1st half results are worrying, both Commercial and Business Aircraft did have slightly better revenues than last year, BUT most worrying are the Book to Bill ratios (orders/deliveries), Commercial had 0.67 (CRJ line only 0.26) while Business Aircraft had 0.29, in short, both Commercial and Business Jet divisions are seeing very few new firm orders, yet Embraer posted book to bill ratio of 2.64 for its E-Jets (124 firm orders, 47 deliveries) in the first half of this year, the 124 E-Jet orders vs 7 CRJ orders (7 x CRJ-900’s for Mesa) so far this year, says novels about the two products attractiveness, their marketing, promotion and sales, a very serious downward trend indeed for the CRJ brand. Now Bombardier will see deteriorating revenue and cash flow numbers from Commercial and Business aircraft divisions at a time it needs lots and lots of cash, as it “Burned” over $US 1.553 billion in free cash-flow (FCF) in the first 6 months of this year on the CSeries and G7000/8000 programs, and is on target to “Burn” another $US 1.5 billion by year’s end, which wipes away all the new equity and debt it raised in February of this year. An IPO (initial public offering) of Transportation division (trains) is set for the 4th quarter this year which will raise lots of cash (up to $US 5.0 billion for 100%, but only a minority will be sold, most likely to Siemens), so around $US 2.0+ billion is possible as debt is very high at almost $US 10 billion, so where is Bombardier heading ? Many analyst and investors believe there is NO clear path to recovery in sight, while Macquarie Financial lowers BBD.B target stock price to $C 1.00 and yet its own subsidiary, AirFinance (commercial aircraft lessor) has 40 CS300’s on order worth $US 3.14 billion ?? On the bright side, the CSeries is 3+/- months away from certification, and new orders will start coming in after that and the stock will rebound on any positive news. More liquidity is badly needed by 2017, but the Beaudoin family’s control 54% of Bombardier through special class shares, a situation many investors find unacceptable, and many of them may not be lining up next year when Bombardier will need to raise more equity and debt once again, and NOW is the best time for ex-CEO Pierre Beaudoin who created the current mess, and who is now Bombardier’s Executive Chairman of the Board, to go ! It is what is best for the future of the company, as many tough times are still ahead, and there should only be one ‘master’ at the helm at this time as the company’s future is at a crossroad.

Well I am back to writing about Bombardier, my last article was on July 16, 2015 when Bombardier’s stock (TSE:BBD.B) was at a 22 year low of $C 1.84 a share, and I thought it had hit rock bottom, having laid off up to 6,950 employees since January 2014 in 4 rounds and a 5th … Continue reading

ABSTRACT: Bombardier announces its 4th round of lay-offs in 17 months, another 1,750 employees are let go on top of 5,200 laid-off already. The sacred “CASH COW” of Bombardier Aerospace, the high margin Ultra-Long Range Global brand is facing a softening in its market segment. The Bombardier Global brand (the $52M G5000 and $62M G6000) keeps Bombardier Aerospace alive, generating $4.5B (on 80 deliveries) in revenue in 2014 (43% of Aerospace revenue, 60% of Business Jet revenue with only 27% of deliveries). New competition from the Gulfstream’s G500/G600 and the Dassault Falcon 8X is threatening Global sales and margins at a time when Bombardier is bleeding cash certifying the CSeries and its new Globals ($75M G7000 and $71M G8000). Presently Bombardier Commercial has only 90 CRJ’s in backlog (18 months of production) and only 52 Q400’s in backlog (26 months of production), while the CSeries with $5.3B in deferred program costs and big price discounting by Airbus, Boeing and Embraer, will see every CSeries sold at a HUGE loss for many years to come. Now Bombardier is looking to sell its rail unit to raise cash, and in all seriousness all of this leaves the new Global 7000 and 8000 as the only hope for a brighter future at Bombardier Aerospace, and the possibility of a future Chinese acquisition of Bombardier Commercial (aka “Combardier”) is very real.

Once again Bombardier has acknowledged that things are not well with the world’s only plane and train manufacturer, and will lay-off another 1,750 employees on top of the 5,200 already announced since January 21, 2014. The big hit will be in Montreal (completions) with 1,000 employees, Toronto (assembly) with 480 employees and Belfast, Ireland with … Continue reading

ABSTRACT: Bombardier may have its CSeries launch customer in newly re-branded Lufthansa Group owned Swiss Global Air Lines which ‘should’ get the aircraft by 1Q/2016 ? at the earliest, while Bombardier desperately tries to ‘re-position’ the Q400 as a viable ATR-72-600 competitor with a “secret new technique” of slowing it down for better fuel economy and trip costs ?? the Q400 is $10 million more expensive, it uses 104% more power (shp), therefore it burns 40% more block fuel, engine maintenance is more expensive on PW150 than PW127 so how can it be economically close to the ATR which out sells the Q400 by a wide margin even with deep discounting on the Q400, meanwhile experts say the CSeries needs to be discounted by 50% to get the needed BIG airline orders as that is what BIG airlines expect, welcome to the BIG league Bombardier where huge discounts (30% to 50%) by Airbus and Boeing are the norm rather than the exception which can be up to 65%, and you can’t win a price war against Boeing or Airbus, can Bombardier even afford to heavily discount now that break-even has to be 580+ units as the CSeries program cost grows to $5.4 billion from an initial $3.4 billion and production is planned at only 10 per month ? break-even is now 6 years of production, can it afford NOT to discount with sales still stuck at a scant 243 “firm” orders (some highly questionable) after 6 years and NO major US airline order in sight ? meanwhile Lufthansa Group’s Austrian Airlines takes 17 x E195’s over CS100’s just like Air Canada kept its 25 x E190’s instead of buying the CSeries last summer, both after a thorough cost evaluation, so what gives with the economics of the CSeries ? Learjet without the Learjet 85 has little to offer, a sale of that company should be considered, the ‘good’ news is that Bombardier successfully raised $C 868 million in new equity and $C 2.25 billion in high yield debt to bolster its liquidity problem.

The news at Bombardier Inc. keeps getting worst, as this past week China’s locomotive manufacturers China CNR Corp. was acquired by China CSR Corp. in a $US 26 billion merger, creating a large state owned enterprise (SOE) that will surely give the 3 other large train manufacturers Siemens (Germany), Bombardier (Canada) and Alstom (France) lots … Continue reading

ABSTRACT: Bombardier has gone outside the company and family for its new President/CEO, Mr. Alain Bellemare from UTC, his main task has to be the radical turnaround of the $10.49 B a year Aerospace Division, as the $US 3.4 B CSeries program is now $US 5.4 B ! and EIS is NOT until 2016, in 2014 Aerospace lost $995 M, free cash flow was a $ -1.059 B, Commercial Aircraft’s CRJ and Q400 sales slowly fading even with +30% discounts (only 27% of revenue) while business jet orders are down 59% in 2014 from 2013 with a disappointing Order to Bill Ratio of only 0.6 (sold less than it delivered), Business Aircraft has always been strong (72% of revenue) now facing new competing aircraft programs that are going to challenge it’s sacred high margin ‘Cash Cow’ Global brand ($4.5 B in sales on 80 delivered and 43% of total revenue), off course more liquidity is needed to finish the CSeries and Global 7000/8000’s, so $US 2.1 B in new in debt and equity will be raised, while the struggling CSeries order book of 243 units now needs at least 550 orders to break-even, it is time to fix Bombardier Aerospace from the top down and possibly JV with China’s Comac (aka “Combardier”)

Following up my blog article on Bombardier Aerospace on January 20th, where I dared to ask the question if it was time for Bombardier to look outside Bombardier and the family for a new CEO, like they did back in 2002, the answer came Feb 11th, when Mr. Alain Bellemare was hired as the new … Continue reading

Bombardier counters criticism of its “sluggish” CSeries sales by claiming the “CSeries dominates the 100 -149 seat category” SERIOUSLY ? Let’s look at this Public Relations ‘spin’ on what is clearly a dismal sales performance for the CSeries program with only 203 orders since 2009 and examine where the problem really lies with the CSeries.

According to Mr. Fred Morais, Marketing Director at Bombardier Commercial Aircraft, the description of CSeries as “sluggish” is not correct, in fact according to Bombardier it “dominates” (verb: like controls, commands) the 100-149 seat market” with its 203 orders from 12 customers and 1 undisclosed since 2009, apparently “these sales figures speak for themselves” says Mr. … Continue reading